Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 584-591.e7, September 2010

Four-year randomized prospective comparison of percutaneous ePTFE/nitinol self-expanding stent graft versus prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass in the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease

Presented at the Southern Association for Vascular Surgery, Paradise Island, Bahamas, January 21, 2010.

  • Karen McQuade, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
  • ,
  • Dennis Gable, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Dr Dennis R. Gable, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, 621 N. Hall St., Ste. 100, Dallas, TX 75226
  • ,
  • Greg Pearl, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX
  • ,
  • Brian Theune, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Womack Army Medical Center, Fort Bragg, NC
  • ,
  • Steve Black, MSPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Received 22 January 2010; accepted 30 March 2010. published online 02 July 2010.

Background

This is a randomized prospective study comparing the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease percutaneously with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)/nitinol self-expanding stent graft (stent graft) versus surgical femoral to above-knee popliteal artery bypass with synthetic graft material.

Methods

One hundred limbs in 86 patients with superficial femoral artery occlusive disease were evaluated from March 2004 to May 2005. Patient symptoms included both claudication and limb threatening ischemia with or without tissue loss. Trans-Atlantic InterSociety Consensus (TASC II) A (n = 18), B (n = 56), C (n = 11), and D (n = 15) lesions were included. Patients were randomized prospectively into one of two treatment groups; a percutaneous treatment group (group A; n = 50) with angioplasty and placement of one or more stent grafts, or a surgical treatment group (group B; n = 50) with a femoral to above-knee popliteal artery bypass using synthetic conduit (Dacron or ePTFE). Patients were followed for 48 months. Follow-up evaluation included clinical assessment, physical examination, ankle-brachial indices, and color flow duplex sonography at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months.

Results

Mean total lesion length of the treated arterial segment in the stent graft group was 25.6 cm (SD = 15 cm). The stent graft group demonstrated a primary patency of 72%, 63%, 63%, and 59% with a secondary patency of 83%, 74%, 74%, and 74% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. The surgical femoral-popliteal group demonstrated a primary patency of 76%, 63%, 63%, and 58% with a secondary patency of 86%, 76%, 76%, and 71% at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months, respectively. No statistical difference was found between the two groups with respect to primary (P = .807) or secondary (P = .891) patency.

Conclusion

Management of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease with percutaneous stent grafts exhibits similar primary patency at 4-year (48 month) follow up when compared with conventional femoral-popliteal artery bypass grafting with synthetic conduit. This treatment method may offer an alternative to treatment of the superficial femoral artery segment for revascularization when prosthetic bypass is being considered or when autologous conduit is unavailable.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr Gable has received research funding from W.L. Gore and Medtronic and has served as a consultant for W.L. Gore. Dr Pearl has received research funding from W.L. Gore. Mr Black has received consulting fees from W.L. Gore.

 Additional material for this article may be found online at www.jvascsurg.org.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(10)00904-3

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.071

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 52, Issue 3 , Pages 584-591.e7, September 2010