Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 648-654, March 2010

Prevention of thromboembolic events in surgical patients through the creation and implementation of a computerized risk assessment program

  • Sarah Jane Novis, BA

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • George E. Havelka, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Denise Ostrowski, RN

      Affiliations

    • Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Betsy Levin, MA

      Affiliations

    • Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Laurie Blum-Eisa, RN

      Affiliations

    • Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Jay B. Prystowsky, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
    • Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
  • ,
  • Melina R. Kibbe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
    • Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
    • Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Chicago, Ill
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Melina R. Kibbe, MD, Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair St., #650, Chicago, IL 60611

Received 21 July 2009; accepted 31 August 2009. published online 18 December 2009.

Objectives

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major source of postoperative morbidity and mortality and is currently a major quality improvement initiative. Mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis is effective in preventing postoperative thromboembolic events, yet it remains underutilized in the clinical setting. Thus, the objective of this study was to develop and implement a computerized DVT risk assessment program in the electronic medical record and determine its effect on compliance with DVT prophylaxis guidelines.

Methods

A standardized DVT risk assessment program was developed and incorporated into the Computerized Patient Record System for all surgical patients at the Jesse Brown Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Four hundred consecutive surgical patients before and after implementation were evaluated for DVT risk, the prescription of pharmacological and mechanical DVT prophylaxis, and the development of thromboembolic events.

Results

With implementation of the DVT risk assessment program, the number of patients receiving the recommended pharmacological prophylaxis preoperatively more than doubled (14% to 36%) (P < .001), and use of sequential compression devices (SCD) increased 40% (P < .001). Overall, the percentage of at-risk patients receiving the recommended combined DVT prophylaxis of SCD and pharmacological prophylaxis increased nearly seven-fold (5% to 32%) (P < .001). The assessment also improved use of prophylaxis postoperatively, increasing SCD use by 27% (P < .001). With respect to DVT occurrence, there was an 80% decrease in the incidence of postoperative DVT at 30 days and a 36% decrease at 90 days; however, this did not reach statistical significance due to the low event rate.

Conclusions

The creation and implementation of a standardized DVT risk assessment program in the electronic medical record significantly increased use of pharmacological and mechanical DVT prophylaxis before surgery in a Veterans Affairs Medical Center setting.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Competition of interest: none.

 The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the JVS policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a competition of interest.

PII: S0741-5214(09)01832-1

doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.097

Journal of Vascular Surgery
Volume 51, Issue 3 , Pages 648-654, March 2010